Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="xxThanatosx89" data-source="post: 404169" data-attributes="member: 47485">Oh this is a tuff one it's like someone asking you if you would like to be stabbed in the right leg or the left leg both are **** options there are games on Nintendo 64 that have more quality and originality than both those games combinedAs far as multiplayer black ops would have an advantage Exmpl in game it lets you know who is in a party wich was usefull while mw3 just showed that they had the capability to speak but did not let in on their current status being as it only showed the mic iconMw3 was a game that they released to make money it is basically mw2 it has almost the same lookThe campaign was iffy at best taking approximately 2-3 hours to complete Mw3 is also not a team based game regardless of game type it's strictly a lone wolf game full of try hard 13-yr olds While there is much better games out there (battlefield, mass, effect, gears of war, and halo) just to name a few between black ops and mw3 black ops was an all around better game.As far as blops 2 I'd save my money for a real game it's better than seeing cod run out of wars so they decide to do one on the future come on and that's the best they got. They could drop it and start something new seeing as all there games are just copies of the last one</blockquote>

Top Bottom